Tuesday, January 12, 2010
1:57 AM |
Edit Post
You That Sing in the Blackthorn
Tell me you
That sing in the black-thorn
Out of what Mind
Your melody springs.
Is it the World-soul
Throbs like a fountain
Up through the throat
Of an elf with wings?
Five sweet notes
In a golden order,
Out of that deep realm
Quivering through,
Flashed like a phrase
Of light through darkness.
But Who so ordered them?
Tell me, Who?
You whose throats
In the rain drenched orchard
Peal your joys
In a cadenced throng;
You whose wild notes,
Fettered by beauty,
Move like the stars
In a rounded song;
Yours is the breath
But Whose is the measure,
Shaped in an ecstasy
Past all art?
Yours is the spending;
Whose is the treasure?
Yours is the blood-beat;
Whose is the heart?
Minstrels all
That have woven your houses
Of withies and twigs
With a Mind in wrought,
Ye are the shuttles;
But out of what Darkness
Gather your thoughtless
Patterns of thought?
Bright eyes glance
Through your elfin doorways,
Roofed with rushes,
And lined with moss.
Whose are the voiceless
pangs of creation?
Yours is the wild bough:
Whose is the Cross?
Carols of light
From a lovelier kingdom,
Gleams of a music
On earth unheard,
Scattered like dew
By the careless wayside,
Pour through the lifted
Throat of a bird.
by Alfred Noyes
Where does learning begin? When does one begin to be aware of the consist flow of sheer knowing into his soul? Sight, sound, taste, touch—all inescapable ports of vessels that our minds struggle to name and our hearts to love or reject. Or is knowledge not the reaction of experience, but the struggle of the incorporeal soul to remember herself and her true home in the world of sensation around her?
The modern age hates giants. The magnificent man is the inherent proof against democracy, and democracy is all-good. Therefore democracy has always been good (alas, we must be absolutists even in the face of Hegelian relativism), and if it has always been good, there can never have been giants. Thus, to say that Plato and Aristotle divided the worlds of belief between themselves sends up shrieks of denunciation from the modern man. Such a statement is surely the phlegm of Western chauvinism stirred with the obsequious spittle of traditionalism.
Yet, erase the faces of modern thinkers. Forget these two men were far too near to each other to achieve such divergence. Assume not that there could never have been two giants of thought, one with his head touching the dome of the sky, the other with his feet buried in the molten hell of Earth.
The Soul Only Knows: I by Rachel Rudd is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at foolishnessntears.blogspot.com.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Jacobitess
- Warsaw, Poland
- Domine, spero quia mundum vicisti. Lord, I trust that Thou hast overcome the world. Panie, ufam, żeś pokonał świat.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(75)
-
▼
January
(16)
- For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whol...
- Ignatian Exercises: Blessed Are the Persecuted
- The Unease of the Non-Sufferer: II
- The Unease of the Non-Sufferer: I
- Fae Truth
- '...laissez, laissez: ma foi, je ne veux point que...
- Splendour of Moon and Radiance of Sun: II
- Splendour of Moon and Radiance of Sun: I
- Crimes of Passion Spent: II
- Crimes of Passion Spent: I
- The Soul Only Knows: III
- The Soul Only Knows: II
- The Soul Only Knows: I
- No Dog Is Ugly
- Christmas in the Olden Days
- Give Me a Heart for Giving
-
▼
January
(16)
0 comments:
Post a Comment